Mining the Dynamic Time Frames to Discovery Ranking Fraud in Mobile Apps



Ranking fraud in the Mobile App showcase alludes to fraudulent or beguiling exercises which have a reason for knocking up the Apps in the prevalence list. In reality, it turns out to be increasingly visit for App designers to utilize shady means, for example, swelling their Apps' deals or posting imposter App evaluations, to confer ranking fraud. While the significance of forestalling ranking fraud has been generally perceived, there is constrained comprehension and research around there. To this end, in this paper, we give an all encompassing perspective of ranking fraud and propose a ranking fraud identification framework for mobile Apps. In particular, we first propose to precisely find the ranking fraud by mining the dynamic time frames, to be specific driving sessions, of mobile Apps. Such driving sessions can be utilized for distinguishing the neighborhood inconsistency rather than worldwide irregularity of App rankings. Moreover, we research three sorts of proofs, i.e., ranking based confirmations, rating based proofs and audit based proofs, by displaying Apps' ranking, rating and survey practices through measurable speculations tests. What's more, we propose a streamlining based accumulation strategy to coordinate every one of the confirmations for fraud recognition. At last, we assess the proposed framework with certifiable App information gathered from the iOS App Store for quite a while period. In the tests, we approve the adequacy of the proposed framework, and demonstrate the versatility of the identification calculation and in addition some normality of ranking fraud exercises. We first propose a basic yet viable calculation to distinguish the main sessions of each App in view of its authentic ranking records. At that point, with the investigation of Apps' ranking practices, we find that the fraudulent Apps regularly have distinctive ranking examples in every driving session contrasted and typical Apps. Consequently, we describe some fraud confirmations from Apps' chronicled ranking records, and create three capacities to concentrate such ranking based fraud confirmations. We additionally propose two sorts of fraud proofs in light of Apps' appraising and survey history, which mirror some oddity designs from Apps' chronicled rating and audit records. In reality, audit control is a standout amongst the most imperative point of view of App ranking fraud. The proposed structure is adaptable and can be reached out with other space created confirmations for ranking fraud location. To the best of our insight, there is no current benchmark to choose which driving sessions or Apps truly contain ranking fraud. Along these lines, we create four instinctive baselines and welcome five human evaluators to approve the viability of our approach Evidence Aggregation based Ranking Fraud Detection (EA-RFD).

Full Text:


Copyright (c) 2016 Edupedia Publications Pvt Ltd

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


All published Articles are Open Access at 

Paper submission: