Labour Crisis and Employee’s Invention: Need for Authoritative Legislation
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
F.O. Babafemi, Intellectual Property: The Law and Practice of Copyright, Trade Marks, Patent and Industrial Designs in Nigeria,Justinian Books Ltd, Nigeria, 2006, p. 342.
Head of Federal Military Govt. v Public Service Commission & Ors. Ex Parte Maclean Kubeinje (1974) 11 SC 79.
D. Bainbridge, Intellectual Property, 4th edn., Longman, London, 2002, p. 4 et seq.
Electrolux Ltd. v Hudson (1977) FSR 312; Greater Health Board Applications (1996) RPC 207.
Nabhan v Nabhan (1967) 1 ALL NLR 47; Anya v State (1966) NMLR 62.
G.O.S. Amadi, “Employees Invention and the Contract of Employment”, (1989-1990)4 N.J.R. pp. 59-69.
British Reinforced Concrete v Lind (supra); British Syphon Co. v Homewood (1956) RPC 225.
Hepple & O’Higgins, Employment Law, 4th edn., Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1979, p. 212.
British Reinforced Concrete v Lind (1917) 34 R.P.C. 101; Adamson v Kemsworthy (1932) 49 R.P.C. 57; British Celanese v Moncrieff (1948) Ch. 564.
A.S. Hornby (ed.), Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English, 7th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, p. 786.
Copyright (c) 2014 C.J.S. Azoro, A.N. Umeh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All published Articles are Open Access at https://journals.pen2print.org/index.php/ijr/
Paper submission: ijr@pen2print.org