Labour Crisis and Employee’s Invention: Need for Authoritative Legislation
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
F.O. Babafemi, Intellectual Property: The Law and Practice of Copyright, Trade Marks, Patent and Industrial Designs in Nigeria,Justinian Books Ltd, Nigeria, 2006, p. 342.
Head of Federal Military Govt. v Public Service Commission & Ors. Ex Parte Maclean Kubeinje (1974) 11 SC 79.
D. Bainbridge, Intellectual Property, 4th edn., Longman, London, 2002, p. 4 et seq.
Electrolux Ltd. v Hudson (1977) FSR 312; Greater Health Board Applications (1996) RPC 207.
Nabhan v Nabhan (1967) 1 ALL NLR 47; Anya v State (1966) NMLR 62.
G.O.S. Amadi, “Employees Invention and the Contract of Employment”, (1989-1990)4 N.J.R. pp. 59-69.
British Reinforced Concrete v Lind (supra); British Syphon Co. v Homewood (1956) RPC 225.
Hepple & O’Higgins, Employment Law, 4th edn., Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1979, p. 212.
British Reinforced Concrete v Lind (1917) 34 R.P.C. 101; Adamson v Kemsworthy (1932) 49 R.P.C. 57; British Celanese v Moncrieff (1948) Ch. 564.
A.S. Hornby (ed.), Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English, 7th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, p. 786.
Copyright (c) 2014 C.J.S. Azoro, A.N. Umeh
![Creative Commons License](http://licensebuttons.net/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All published Articles are Open Access at https://journals.pen2print.org/index.php/ijr/
Paper submission: ijr@pen2print.org